Differentiate This: Reflections
May 14th, 2008I’ve had some time now to reflect on my blog’s discussion about differentiation that brought about some pretty exciting comments, particularly on this post about classroom management which now has 40 comments, most of them about differentiation even though that wasn’t what the post was about.
Tracking vs. Differentiation is the Wrong Argument
I think the discussion was framed incorrectly by people who viewed the conversation as one about tracking vs. differentiation. I understand that the argument was framed as such if you followed certain links in but I reject the idea that tracking means you won’t have to differentiate because even then the students have different talents and skills. I’m also not about discussing whether heterogenous groupings of students is better or not better. The fact is that most classes are put together with mixed ability groupings and I’m about how to make that work. Arguments for or against differentiation have their place but this isn’t it.
We Have to Accept Mediocrity/Every Teacher Can’t Be a Superstar
No we don’t/not every teacher has to be.
These were a couple of the comments I received. If you haven’t heard me when I say that differentiation through methods like writer’s workshop and student research are not more work for a teacher than traditional worksheets then I haven’t done what I set out to do.
I do not consider myself a superstar and I’m not one of those teachers who stays at school until six o’clock at night every day cleaning my closets. Many teachers put in a lot of time and it doesn’t necessarily translate into better teaching. I like teaching methods that require little preparation but involve small tweaks that make huge differences in student learning…like having students pair share information, employing visuals for presentation, allowing students to choose topics of interest to them. None of these things take more of my personal time and they each have paid big dividends for me. Try them out.
English Language Learners Don’t Read My Blog
I sympathize with the gifted parents who read and commented on my blog posts. In the interest of full-disclosure I was identified as gifted in the second grade and although I was placed in regular classrooms I participated in a pull-out GATE program. Those who commented that gifted students need to be challenged and engaged are preaching to the choir if they’re talking to me.
However, the voices of parents of English Language Learners I teach are apparently not represented in the comments. I reject the idea that gifted students are the only ones who are bored in class. I think everyone needs better (read more engaging and relevant teaching that promotes higher level thinking). The idea that your lowest students can’t participate in writing and research on their current academic level is hogwash.
Teacher Used to Do It All the Time
My favorite comment received is from Carolyn who said:
Teachers used to differentiate instruction all the time–this was what happened in one room school houses, with eight grades. All kids learned to work independently and all kids’ needs could be addressed since there were eight levels of material at any given moment.
While one-room schoolhouses had a lot of problems, I do get tired of whining about how hard it is to have students of different talents in the same room.
I don’t see engaging students of different levels as an option, I think that’s what teaching is.




However, I’m also offering two new courses, iMovie ‘08 Bootcamp and Final Cut Express bootcamp. These classes are a a mixture of the technical and the artistic. You’ll come away able to use the software programs but also with a sense of shot composition, pacing, and the cinema techniques. I’ll teach you everything I learned before dropping out of NYU film school and from my experience as an independent (many films for no money) filmmaker.
Freda Needleman
When we recorded our voice overs for 

